Two distinguished
historians and two contrasting opinions of a book. Just for fun, I’ve included
each of their opinions below, and then I’ll give my evaluation of John Scott’s, Story Of The Thirty-Second Iowa Infantry
Volunteers published in 1896.
Dr. James I. Robertson,
Jr., from Civil War Books: A Critical
Bibliography, Vol. 1:
“A poor effort toward a
history; the author borrowed heavily from official sources and some letters
published in newspapers; there is no evidence that Scott relied on any
manuscript sources” (page 156).
Dr. Ludwell H. Johnson
from Red River Campaign: Politics &
Cotton in the Civil War:
“This was by far the most
valuable regimental history used. Scott was more compiler than author, and he
gathered some very informative eyewitness accounts of the campaign. The map of
the field at Pleasant Hill was extremely helpful in reconstructing the battle.
The book also contains much information on the battle itself, and on A. J.
Smith’s proposal to arrest Banks” (page 298).
So which opinion do I
agree with? The winner is Dr. Ludwell H. Johnson in this instance. Most of Dr.
Robertson’s evaluations in Civil War
Books are reasonable to me, but his evaluation of the Scott book is
puzzling. Yes, Scott’s book does include excerpts from the Official Records as did many regimental histories written by
veterans. However, Scott’s inclusion of eyewitnessaccounts of the regiment’s
campaigns makes his book particularly valuable to historians. Altogether
Scott devoted 158 pages of his 526-page book to coverage of the Red River
campaign. This is appropriate since the 32nd Iowa Infantry served
actively in the campaign, and lost 86 men killed or mortally wounded at the
battle of Pleasant Hill. Scott’s book is anything but “a poor effort toward a
history.” 
